ARE AFRICAN AMERICANS ANTI-SCIENCE?
 
 
by Keith W. Jones
 
"Are African Americans Anti-Science?" is a question that I often ask myself. Several reasons why this question is so fascinating to me stem from the facts:
 
That I work in the scientific, engineering, and technological career field.

That the numbers of young people pursuing careers in science, engineering, and technology professions are extremely low. By some estimates African Americans represent approximately fourteen percent of the US population, but make up less than two percent of the scientists and engineers. [These numbers become worse, when we consider how many African Americans pursue advanced degrees in science and engineering.]

That as an inquisitive child, I experienced fifty percent affirmation and fifty percent condemnation for asking so many questions such as "How does the television set work?" or "Why is grass green?" or "Why is the sky blue?" or "How does the light switch or car work?" or "Mama, was there such a thing as Black cowboys?" or "Did colored people do anything worth talking about?" [As you can imagine, to some people my questions were extremely frustrating and frightening. The time when I grew up (the 1950s, 60s, and 70s) was an era when the country was in great turmoil. African Americans were demanding that they be given first class citizenship because they were paying first class taxes and doing first class dying in Viet Nam; that they be released from de facto enslavement; and that Black Studies and History be incorporated into all curricula.]

That this period (the 1950s, 60s and 70s) was a time, and some insist that it still is this time, during which as I stated earlier, the African American community was extremely ambivalent about intellectualism and science. I can recall reading a passage in Richard Wright's Black Boy, in which he wrote about growing up in rural Mississippi and explained how his relatives felt extremely threatened by his burgeoning intellectualism and inquisitiveness.
 
During Wright's early years, from his birth in 1908 through his youth in the 1920s, it was commonly believed that an intelligent African American in almost any part of the United States could bring harm to the entire community. However as Wright notes, it was especially true in the Deep South, where de facto enslavement of many African Americans was very obvious. The question is "Why was Black intelligence problematic to the power structure?"
 
One answer might be as I implied earlier, if you are paying first class taxes, doing first class dying, and also understand percentages and how to calculate taxes and the like, your resistance to de facto enslavement becomes more problematic for the person or people who want to "keep you in your place".
 
That, out of all the population groups in the United States, few use science more, fear science more, and need science more than African Americans do, a fact which I find both interesting and saddening.

Use of science and technology. African peoples have created, innovated, and developed various forms of science and technology since the beginning of time. However, are African Americans overly concerned about the implementation and less about taking care of business? Examples of what I mean are the following:

Consider the hunter's blow-gun, through which he blows darts for the purpose of catching prey. Let us examine the science in this. The hunter must design the dart in the proper manner so that the projectile will glide through the air and hit the target. (This design is used for missiles, too. They both must be tailored so that they are aerodynamically sound, with every chance of hitting the target.) Before putting the dart into the blow-gun, the hunter must put some type of compound on the dart that will ultimately create some desirable effect on the prey, whether it be instant death or paralysis. The compound must be developed, which includes extracting chemicals such as anesthetics and poisons from insects, plants and animals, et cetera.
 
(This process of anesthetizing was copied by Western science and is used in surgical procedures.)
 
Consider the geometrical and trigonometric precision of the Egyptians in building the pyramids. To this day, on the eve of the 21st century, some experts claim that we still do not have technology or machinery that can lift blocks as heavy and as high as they were lifted to produce the Pyramids. (It is still a mystery how the Egyptians accomplished this feat.)

Consider the science, mathematics and technology which the Moors introduced to Europe.

Consider how many late 19th century African American people filed for patents almost immediately after their release from overt enslavement.

Consider that whenever a new science or technology is released, African Americans are among the first people to use and embrace it, assuming that they can afford it.
 
Consider the prolific and revolutionary scientists and engineers that came and continue to come from the African American community: George Washington Carver, W. Lincoln Hawkins, Valerie Thomas, Otis Boykins, Ben Carson, Percy Julian, Ernest Everett Just, George Carruthers, et cetera.

Consider the athletic prowess of say Michael Jordan, then think about the physics involved in the way that he played the game of basketball.

Consider the amount of science, technology, innovation and ingenuity used to create Rap music with its sampling, looping, et cetera; in engineering circles this is called Digital Signal Processing (DSP). (I am uncertain if I am being speculative, but please recall the television commercials in which deceased actors and entertainers are blended into new film with present-day actors.
 
Could this be a derivative from African American innovation in Rap music, now the most profitable form of music in the music business?)
 
Fear of science and technology. It seems to me that we fear science or become anti-science and technology for several reasons:

When an activity is presented to us in its subject, predicate, and adjective forms, we may be confused. That is, if someone were to write on paper or on a computer the name of what we have just done, whether it involves playing a sport, cooking, or making Rap music, there is a possibility that we may not recognize it as being the same thing. Nonetheless, there is no reason to fear it. The purpose that writing serves is repeatability, so that something good can be repeated again, or made better.
 
Replication is the reason that writing or mathematical formulae describing a slam dunk, music, chemical formulae describing a phenomena, and recipes exist. We have already done the act, and played the musical note, but this is what it represents on paper or on a computer. Symbology and notation frighten many people.

When the ability to understand and manipulate science, technology, mathematics, and abstract ideas reflects our intelligence, we try to play it down. Of course, as most of us know, in some parts of the African American community acting, thinking, talking, writing, and calculating in intelligent and thought provoking ways are forbidden. There is a severe problem in some communities where demonstrating intelligence means that you are less Cool (see the reruns of the Steve Urkel character portrayed on, the old television show, "Family Matters") or acting White.
 
Need for understanding science, engineering, and technology.

On the eve of the 21st century, African Americans need better understanding of science, engineering, technology, and mathematics as much as, if not more than, most groups of people in the United States. We have high rates of diabetes, high blood pressure and cancer.
 
We discuss poverty, scientific and mathematical illiteracy in our communities, but have a tendency to chase away those people of African descent in the sciences who can contribute their skills and knowledge. On the other hand, we also have people who are selfish and self-centered and stingy with what they know and can do.
We are unwilling to help finance many forms of abstraction, but these are how jobs, careers, entrepreneurship and wealth are created (see Microsoft, Apple, et cetera).
 
We are unwilling to take the hard courses, but a company needs only so many managers; sometimes more Indians than chiefs are necessary. The writing is on the wall, we must become Knowledge Workers (computer scientists, information managers, network mangers, webmasters, research or process engineers and scientists) or perish.

There are athletes and musical artists who do not and did not understand legalities, contracts, business, percentages, finance, science, technology, fractions, or musical notes, which cost them dearly. Moreover, their successes were and are sometimes forms of instant gratification (or short-term gain)-the acquiring of material things-which sometimes leads them into experiencing de facto forms of enslavement-forcing them to return to their home communities totally impoverished after being used up (after having sacrificed plausible long-term independence for short-term gratification).
 
Then there are those such as Oprah Winfrey, Spike Lee, Bill Cosby, Michael Jordan, Quincy Jones and the like who have retained control over their own destinies by writing, producing, counting, and becoming intimately involved in all matters concerning them.
 
I have not written this essay to, as my kids like to say, "Diss" anyone, but out of love and concern. The love comes from having studied the histories of the African and African American communities and knowing how mighty and noble they were and continue to be. It also comes from examining our historical scientific and technological contributions to science world histories and understanding them to be tremendous.

The concern comes from understanding how woefully unprepared I was during my freshman year at a two year technical college, only 21 years old, fresh out of the southeast Asian experience, with a wife and three kids.
 
Had I tried to do this in today's world, I would have been unqualified and at best stuck in the university division of some institution taking remedial courses in mathematics, general science, et cetera; until the money train ran out. Instead, I went to school at a time when there were no such filters, and, I (as well as others) was allowed to jump in and take courses such as physics, engineering science, mechanics, and calculus which were way over my head get my grades of "Cs", "Ds", or "Fs" and repeat the courses over again, until I mastered the subject matters.
 
The course work was difficult for me, not from an intelligence perspective, but because of my lacking discipline, not knowing how I learn, not knowing how to study, and not knowing how to systematically pick problems apart to solve them.
 
These were the things that I learned in college. It is tougher to use this type of technique today. Young people must be qualified; otherwise there is a high probability of their getting caught up in the university division, taking remedial courses.

What can we do about this, since more doctors, lawyers, engineers, scientists, and technologists are needed for the 21st century career and entrepreneurship markets? Many people argue over the qualities of the teachers and schools and textbooks and equipment. Therefore, I will not rehash those. In my humble opinion, the idea of your young person becoming a burgeoning computer scientist, engineer, or lawyer starts at home. Here are some of my recommendations for how parents might lightly guide their youngsters into developing skills in these areas:
 
As a parent (or as parents), you cannot ask your child or children to study something that you are unwilling to make the same sacrifice to study yourself.

It is important to create an atmosphere for learning, reflecting, and intelligent discussion. Moreover, the parents have to actually read the material to demonstrate its importance.

Never, never, never, "Did I say never?" discourage your child or children from asking questions that you cannot answer. Be willing to help them find the answers to their questions. This is where some African Americans become upset, because from a cultural perspective, some of us assume that it is the teacher's job to do this. However, this cultural misunderstanding is the reason that so many of our children end up falling behind. Lack of parental participation in the learning process and the lack of exposure of African American children and young adults to the social and cultural values of the so-called majority group are other reasons that they sometimes score low on these types of cultural tests (PSAT, SAT, ACT, GMAT, GRE, LSAT).

If you can afford them, buy your young person several books such as a hardback dictionary (for vocabulary purposes), thesaurus (for understanding how many ways a person can say the same thing), science and technology dictionary (science and technology terms appear the same but are often different from regular English words), and books such as Usborne (a British publication that simplifies science, physics, electricity, et cetera). Otherwise, you can find most of these at libraries.

Help them to understand that the equations are adjectives describing the nouns, and that they can view the variables in the equations the same way one views a person changing clothing. In other words, the equation represents something that could happen given certain conditions. Like the changing of clothes from one day to the next, the variables in the equation are representative of the changing of certain conditions. Thus, in all forms of science, engineering, and technology you are trying to answer one of two questions:
 
(1) What happens when I change this variable? And (2) What is the equation that represents this phenomenon?
 
I believe African Americans, like many Americans, are anti-science. However, that attitude hurts us more than it helps us. Another question that comes to my mind: Are we anti-science because it seems like the thing to be? What I find most interesting is that for a people who are anti-science, we sure do use a lot of science and mathematics and physics in the music that we make, foods that we prepare, sports that we play, and the medicinal roots that we use. Let me know if you think I am off track.
 
Warmest regards.
Keith Jones
 
Beyond Words Village
Give us your thoughts and opinions!
 
Keith W. Jones is a practicing engineer-scientist, program manager, and Ph.D.
candidate in Applied Science and History of Science and Technology
Email: joneskw@ix.netcom.com
 
This article was published courtesy of Keith W. Jones.
Copyright © 2000 Keith W. Jones. All rights reserved by the author.
 
 
| KINGDOM | ABOUT US | BOOKS | SCULPTURES | MUSIC |
| SHOPPING CART | CUSTOMER SERVICE
|
GLOSSARY OF TERMS | OPEN OUR EYES | NEWSLETTERS |
| BEYOND WORDS | YOUR EYES |
| KNOWLEDGE LINKS | NEW BEGINNINGS | WHAT'S GOING ON |
 
©A.B.N. Enterprises, 1999-2008, all rights reserved. The words
African By Nature are registered trademarks of A.B.N. Enterprises.
Copyright
 
Simply Audiobooks, Inc.